Thanks for your input on this puzzler -quite a challenge!
For a radical departure from our usual pattern puzzle solution, we have the designer herself to explain it all for us. Please, a warm welcome to Martha Palaza who will explain it all for you!
Yes, Marita and Natasha were correct in their assumptions.
This dress -called the Quaver Twist- was designed during a creative cutting course at the Academy of Art University while I was working on my MFA in fashion design. The basic assignments for the course included 38 different schematics which were stitched and then placed on the form to create at least 15 different samples. The catch? This degree was completed entirely online so you can imagine the number of samples I have photographed for potential garments.
Once the basic assignment was completed -in this case “Quaver Twist”, quaver referring to the movement of the fabric- we were required to create our own interpretation. Hence the full title of the design: “Quaver Twist Interpretation.”
Although the dress may appear complicated, the process was quite simple. The fabric was marked according to the stitching plan below (click to see a larger image).
[Again, click on the photo to see a larger image.]
Each circle was then folded horizontally and stitched with a 1/4” seam.
To get an idea of what the dress looks like so far, the fabric is shown draped on the dress form with the wrong side facing out in the below photo:
For the last step, the top circle was twisted to the left (as per the stitching plan I opened with) then stitched vertically overlapping the left circle. The bottom circle was also twisted to the left and then stitched to the right circle. Once the circles were stitched, the fabric was draped on the form and cut to a dress silhouette. The latter is shown below on the table in my studio.
Anyone interested in giving it a try?
I thank Martha Palaza for the time she took to write this post and photograph samples for us. I hope you enjoyed it and will share images of any samples you attempt on your own. Again, thanks Martha!